Solution
Structured evaluations: where AI screening becomes a documented decision
The human step that turns an AI score into a complete decision history
Virkla Structured Evaluations is the link between AI screening and your final hiring decision. Team notes and interview feedback live on the same candidate timeline as the AI score and its "Why this score" evidence — so the call your team makes is fully documented, not reconstructed from chat and docs afterward. Role-based evaluation scorecards are on the product roadmap and will be included in your plan when released.
Solution brief
The human step that turns an AI score into a complete decision history
Who is it for
Recruiters and hiring managers running multi-interview loops who need every AI recommendation followed by documented human judgment.
Key benefit
Notes, the AI score, and the recruiter's decision sit on one candidate record — a complete decision history for audit and review when a hiring manager, DPO, or Works Council asks how a decision was made.
How it looks in the product
Interview notes and team feedback on the candidate timeline, each linked back to the same candidate record as their AI score and evidence. Structured evaluation scorecards (shared rubrics per role) are on the roadmap.
Use cases
Tech company with heavy interview loops
Hiring managers comment in-system instead of Slack. The AI score, the notes, and the final call sit on one timeline.
EU-regulated hiring operations
Structured notes and stage-linked history support governance reviews alongside GDPR-conscious access controls.
Business impact
less recruiter time reconciling feedback from email and docs
the human decision sits next to the AI score — not in a separate doc
a complete decision history — AI screening, human evaluation, final call — for audit and review
Opportunities
What structured evaluations unlock in Virkla today:
Notes where the decision happens
Capture interview feedback on the candidate timeline instead of scattered chats and documents.
One timeline, from AI score to human decision
The "Why this score" evidence and the recruiter's notes share one record — so the ranking and the human call stay connected.
A complete decision history
Recommendation, criteria, human decision, and any override stay on the application for audit and review.
How it works
From interview to decision
Review the AI score and evidence
Open "Why this score" on the candidate: matched skills, gaps, and the profile evidence.
Capture feedback in workspace
Interviewers add notes on the candidate timeline; recruiters keep the conversation in one place.
Decide with full context
Record the human decision next to the original AI score and evidence, then advance or decline with documented rationale.